|
|
|
|
|
Maryland PSC To Hold Further Hearing On Retail Market Changes Due To SB1
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
The Maryland PSC will hold a further hearing on changes to the retail energy market and related rules and processes in light of SB1
The latest hearing in PC 65 will be held on Wednesday, December 11, 2024
The PSC announced the hearing in welcoming stakeholder comments on a petition from retail suppliers for clarification from the PSC on several SB1-related issues; namely, the treatment of variable rate contracts which do not include a contract expiration date and thus are not "renewed", and the treatment of incidental residential accounts with respect to new residential rules, rate caps, and related prohibitions
Generally, SB1 (which includes rate caps among other new mandates) applies to new and "renewed" contracts; hence, retail suppliers are seeking confirmation that variable rate contracts without an end date are not "renewed" but rather continue as provided in the contracts, and that SB 1's provision that the new law shall not impair an "existing obligation or contract" applies to variable rate contracts without an end date
See a full discussion of the issues raised by retail suppliers, including issues regarding variable rate contracts which do not have an expiration date, here
While the PSC set the hearing in welcoming comments on the retail suppliers' latest request for clarification, the hearing was broadly noticed in the PC65 SB1 implementation proceeding, and the PSC did not specifically indicate that the hearing would be limited to the two new issues (variable rate contracts without an end date and IRAs) newly raised by retail suppliers
The retail suppliers' latest petition itself noted that suppliers still do not know how they will be able to bill residential customers starting January 1, 2025, as this "threshold" question remains outstanding (the issue largely being: how a continuation of POR would be implemented for grandfathered POR customers while implementing SB1's ban on POR for new & renewed residential customers; and would any mandatory dual billing be required as a result)
It is unclear if the PSC's December 11, 2024 hearing will more broadly address outstanding SB1 billing and POR questions
As previously reported by ECM, PSC Staff has proposed to implement SB1 by allowing residential utility consolidated billing with POR to continue through an intended end date of June 1, 2026 for existing customers (contracts existing or renewed prior to January 1, 2025).
Staff proposes to mandate the use of dual billing for residential contracts entered into or renewed on or after January 1, 2025, with this requirement intended to last until June 1, 2026. SB 1 prohibits POR for new and renewed residential customers
See full background and details here
PC 65, PC65
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
December 2, 2024
Email This Story
Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Director of Policy and Research, Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Director, Load Forecasting
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Wholesale Markets Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Origination Analyst
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Settlements Analyst
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Billing Supervisor
|
|
|
|
|