Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Large Customer Group Does Not Support Supplier Consolidated Billing Proposal

September 6, 2024

Email This Story
Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

The Ohio Energy Leadership Council (OELC) does not support supplier consolidated billing as it has thus far been proposed in a collaborative at Duke Energy Ohio, OELC said in comments on a post-collaborative report

As first reported by EnergyChoiceMatters.com, Duke recently filed a report on the SCB collaborative in which Duke Energy Ohio recommended to the PUC of Ohio that SCB not be implemented for Duke's customers

Duke, PUCO Staff, the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, and the joint retail suppliers (RESA, NRG, IGS) all submitted recommendations concerning SCB as part of the collaborative report filing in July

Such parties' positions were previously reported in our prior story here

OELC has newly filed comments in response to the post-collaborative report

OELC said that it "does not necessarily oppose" SCB outright, but said that the SCB proposal from retail suppliers in the collaborative, "lacks sufficient oversight and benefits to justify implementing SCB in Duke’s service territory at this time."

Among other things, OELC highlighted the current existence of utility consolidated billing, and Duke's status as a dual fuel utility, under which customers receive one bill for both commodities. OELC noted that the SCB plan proposed in the collaborative could result in customers receiving more bills than they do currently, since the SCB proposal would not mandate that suppliers use SCB, and a customer could still choose one supplier for electricity, and a separate supplier for gas, with such suppliers using different billing methods

"OELC does not understand the value added by SCB. Duke already provides a utility consolidated bill to customers who receive both natural gas and electricity service through Duke. As proposed, however, customers would only continue to receive a single consolidated bill if they selected the same supplier for both natural gas and electric services, and those services voluntarily elected SCB. So, the purported benefit of streamlining multiple bills appears at best equal to the utility consolidated billing that Duke already provides. Further, SCB would create issues with tracking utility costs at large users with multiple meters or locations," OELC said

OELC also expressed concerns with treatment of customer data under SCB, and with cost recovery for SCB implementation

To the extent PUCO approves SCB, OELC said that customers should be required to affirmatively opt into SCB, in a manner separate and distinct from agreeing to SCB as part of a customer's terms of service with a retail supplier

OELC suggested requiring that customers use a "utility form" that would opt the customer out of Duke UCB and opt the customer into SCB

"Any such opt-in should not be part of a supplier agreement or forms, which may be missed by the customer, but a separate form from the utility for that limited purpose with an explanation of the ramifications for the customer," OELC said

Duke, Staff, the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, and the joint retail suppliers all filed supplemental comments, reiterating their previously reported positions

The joint retail suppliers are, as of publication time, the only party to file comments in support of SCB

PUCO Staff, Duke, and OCC oppose SCB

See more details on these parties' positions in our recent story here

Case 23-0867-EL-UNC

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Director of Policy and Research, Retail Energy
NEW! -- Director, Load Forecasting -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Wholesale Markets Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Origination Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Settlements Analyst -- Retail Supplier
NEW! -- Billing Supervisor

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Events

Email Alerts

Retail Energy Jobs

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search