Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

Utility Proposes Several Changes To Default Service Products To Reduce Risk Premiums

Wholesale Suppliers Only (Not Retail Suppliers) Relieved Of Responsibility For Non-Market Based Charges

Proposes Separation Of Residential, Small C&I Default Service Rates Under Common Procurement

Longer Fixed Default Service Rates


May 31, 2024

Email This Story
Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

UGI Utilities, Inc. – Electric Division has filed at the Pennsylvania PUC for approval of a new default service plan (DSP V) that includes proposed changes to the default service portfolio to reduce risk premiums to customers

DSP V would cover the period June 1, 2025 through May 31, 2029

As noted in further detail below, UGI proposed to increase its use of 12-month fixed price full requirements [FPFR] products, while maintaining a revised fixed MW around-the-clock (ATC) block product which UGI said adds price stability

For GSR-1 customers (those under 100 kW), UGI's proposed default service portfolio would include: 1) 24-month ATC block products; 2) staggered 12-month full requirements load-following contracts; and 3) a long-term supply arrangement between UGI and the Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. (about 250kW)

Once over-hanging contracts from DSP IV expire, the "base" of the GSR-1 portfolio would consist of 20 MW of ATC block supply. There would be two staggered tranches of ATC block contracts. Each of the blocks would be for 10 MW of load and would be for a 24-month term.

In contrast, DSP IV used monthly block contracts under 6-month periods, including solicitations for 5x16 (peak) blocks, resulting in variable block sizing which changed throughout the course of DSP IV and impacted the supply needed to be served under DSP IV's fixed price full requirements contracts

UGI has further proposed the ability to change the block procurement based on the level of customer shopping, to reduce the erosion of load served by fixed price full requirements suppliers and thus reduce associated risk premiums

If shopping has grown, "to a point that it has eroded or is likely to erode FPFR tranche size (MW) during the planning horizon," UGI Electric proposes to reduce the amount of 24-month ATC Block supply by not procuring the full size and term of the ATC Block in the next auction. Instead, UGI would procure a 6-month 10 MW ATC Block contract to ensure there is de minimus impact on currently effective FPFR contracts through the remainder of their term, UGI said

In DSP V, once UGI reaches a steady state with the end of over-hanging contracts, UGI proposed to procure two tranches of 12-month fixed price full requirements contracts. Each contract would be for 50% of the fixed price full requirements supply above the 20 MW ATC block purchases, the Allegheny supply, and customer-generation purchased through net metering.

The 12-month fixed price full requirements contracts will be staggered at 6-month intervals

UGI said that it is taking various measures to reduce risk premiums in the fixed price full requirements contracts

These include the use of a fixed MW ATC block to provide more certainty of the load that will be served under the fixed price full requirements contracts, and removing non-market-based (NMB) transmission charges from the responsibility of fixed price full requirements suppliers. These NMB charges include Network Integration Transmission Service Charges, Non-firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Charges, Regional Transmission Enhancement Planning (RTEP) Charges, and Generation Deactivation

Notably, while wholesale suppliers will be relieved of NMB charges, UGI would still recover such costs through default service rates. UGI would be billed NMB charges from PJM for the fixed price full requirements load (in addition to its block load)

Additionally, UGI proposes to address uncertainty regarding future PJM capacity prices by providing "relief" to fixed price full requirements suppliers

Specifically, if the term of the fixed price full requirements contract overlaps with a future capacity period for which PJM has not yet issued a final capacity price, UGI proposes to instruct wholesale suppliers to utilize the most recent capacity price in preparing their bids.

When billed, UGI will compensate wholesale suppliers for the difference between the capacity price upon which bids are based, and the actual capacity price. If the delta is negative, meaning the price used is less than the actual price, suppliers will credit UGI

UGI proposes to provide more time between the auction date for procurements, and the delivery start date, which currently is about 1.5 months

UGI said that, among other things, the "just-in-time" nature of the current schedule resulted in little flexibility to account for a market event.

UGI proposes to use a one-to-three month "window" for future procurements, with the latest month in such window typically being about 2 months before the delivery date (meaning procurements could occur up to 5 months before delivery)

See UGI's proposed default service portfolio products, procurement dates, and term lengths here

UGI proposes to change to fixed 6-month retail default service prices for GSR-1 customers. Currently, UGI's GSR-1 default service rates change quarterly

Furthermore, UGI proposes to implement unique residential and non-residential prices for customers in the GSR-1 procurement class. Currently, all GSR-1 customers pay the same default service rate

UGI would establish unique residential and non-residential rates under GSR-1 by applying an allocation factor to the Energy Cost supply rate component resulting from the GSR-1 procurements (the procurements are not customer class-specific)

Based on a study, the residential Energy Cost rate would be established by multiplying by 1.02 the Energy Cost (EC) component resulting from the procurements. The non-residential Energy Cost rate would be established by applying a factor of 0.93 to the EC component resulting from the procurements

GSR-2 default service customers (at and over 100 kW) would continue to be served under hourly pricing

While UGI does not propose a change in cutoff between fixed price default service (GSR-1) and hourly prices (GSR-2), UGI does propose a change in how the 100 kW for the two classes is measured for net metering customers

Specifically, UGI proposes to place a net metering customer into either class based on supply peak load impact

If a net metering customer’s supply peak load impact is assessed to be less than 100 kW, that customer will be included in the GSR-1 group. If a net metering customer’s supply peak load impact is greater than or equal to 100 kW, that customer will be assigned to GSR-2.

UGI said that there are no current net metering customers that will be impacted by this change. The impact of the change is prospective in nature only, UGI said

UGI proposes to continue its existing New/Moving Customer Referral Program and Standard Offer Customer Referral Program without any changes

UGI reported that, "While the Company stands ready to support a Standard Offer Program, there are no retail EGSs that are currently participating in UGI Electric’s Standard Offer program."

Docket P-2024-3049343

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- Energy Regulatory Specialist
Sr. Market Risk Analyst -- Retail Supplier

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2024 EnergyChoiceMatters.com. Unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited. You are not permitted to copy any work or text of EnergyChoiceMatters.com without the separate and express written consent of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search