Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search

PSC Hears Dispute On Whether Community Solar Credits Can Appear On Supplier Consolidated Billing

February 14, 2024

Email This Story
Copyright 2010-23 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com

The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com

At its administrative meeting today, the Maryland PSC heard from parties concerning whether a customer served under supplier consolidated billing (SCB) may also receive community solar credits under the customer's SCB bill

The PSC took the matter under advisement and did not issue an immediate ruling

The issue was brought before the PSC by Baltimore Gas & Electric, as working groups could not reach consensus on the questions: 1) whether House Bill 908 permits community solar customers to participate in SCB; and 2) if community solar customers are permitted to participate in SCB, how their credits should be applied.

BGE argued that House Bill 908 requires the utility to handle community solar billing and crediting if so requested by the community solar provider, and does not contemplate this obligation being fulfilled by a retail supplier under SCB. While BGE was open to following Commission direction, BGE argued that there was inherent tension under statute between the House Bill 908 requirements imposed on EDCs with respect to community solar, and allowing community solar to be credited and billed under SCB

BGE further said, "incorporating community solar into SCB will require additional billing system upgrades, which will result in increased SCB implementation costs."

"Finally, if utilities are required to incorporate community solar into their SCB system upgrades, the December 31, 2024, SCB implementation deadline will be jeopardized," BGE said

BGE further said, "If the Commission determines that community solar customers should be permitted to participate in SCB, BGE will not be able to continue its method of applying community solar credits unless BGE is permitted to retain all customer community solar credits as opposed to sending said credits to suppliers. BGE’s billing system is not currently designed to handle the complex electronic data interchange transactions that would be needed to transmit credits to and receive credits from suppliers. BGE’s proposal of retaining customer credits to be applied to utility charges is the least costly solution because it avoids the need for additional system upgrades and additional delays in the implementation of SCB."

Commissioners asked BGE to provide supplemental information concerning the additional cost and implementation time if community solar is allowed to be billed and credited on SCB, including for a mechanism under which community solar credits are not solely applied to BGE's distribution charges

Generally, Staff, OPC, retail suppliers and community solar providers agreed that statute permits SCB customers to be billed and credited for community solar under SCB

Staff said that no statute, regulation, or PSC order provides that community solar subscribers shall be precluded from enrollment in Supplier Consolidated Billing

OPC said, "(1) PUA § 7-306.2 does not prohibit community solar customers from participating in SCB; and (2) BGE should apply community solar net energy metering credits to the electric distribution charges on customer bills and should send any unused credits to the SCB supplier to be applied toward electric charges remaining on a customer’s supplier-consolidated bill. OPC therefore recommends that the Commission reject BGE’s request to bar community solar subscribers from participating in SCB and to direct BGE to apply the credits only to electric distribution charges and transfer any unused credits for application to the remaining electric charges on a customer’s supplier-consolidated bill."

In discussing the statutes, and BGE's observation that SCB is not mentioned in the community solar statute, Commissioner Michael Richard cited the existing competitive billing statute, and asked why the community solar statute should not be read in concert with existing statute providing for competitive billing.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
NEW! -- TPV Sales Executive

Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010-23 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Archive

Daily Email

Events

 

 

 

About/Contact

Search