|
|
|
|
Claim: Municipal Aggregation Programs "Offer Choices That Are Not Otherwise Available In The Market"
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Municipal aggregation programs, "offer choices that are not otherwise available in the
market," a group of municipalities said in comments to the Massachusetts DPU concerning proposed DPU guidelines to govern aggregation plan filings and a proposed template plan
See background on the DPU proposal here
A group including more than four dozen municipalities, including the City of Cambridge and the communities of the Cape Light Compact, stated, "in 2022 over 100 communities offered a voluntary product with additional
Class I RECs."
The communities further stated, "Based on the products listed on EnergySwitchMA.gov, not a single competitive
supplier is offering a product with additional Class I RECs. The green products offered by
competitive suppliers all rely on national wind, or similar, RECs, with limited additionality
benefits."
The communities sought less oversight from the DPU, including the ability to offer new products without DPU approval
"Rather than continuing to manage the nuances of every
single aggregation program, the Department should use the Guidelines to set out general rules
and allow municipalities to operate within them. New products, new REC percentages and types,
and other innovations should all be allowed without the need for Department approval. This
approach would be far less time consuming for the Department, give needed flexibility and
appropriate respect to municipal officials, and benefit customers," the communities said
"Enhanced customer choice is one of the primary benefits of aggregation programs, and
one of the primary goals of the competitive electric market. The Guidelines should facilitate the
ability of municipalities to offer new options tailored to their residents and businesses," the communities said
"For example, municipalities should not be precluded or unduly frustrated from offering
new products without first going through a lengthy aggregation plan amendment and approval
process. Take, for example, the case of a municipality that wishes to offer its residents a new,
optional, 100% REC product. Scores of other municipalities offer such a product. A municipality
that wishes to start doing so should not be required to delay for a year or more, waiting for the
Department to give it permission. And, importantly, customers should not be required to wait a
year or more to purchase a product that they want and their community has decided to offer," the communities said
The communities, which have opt-out authority (even if new optional plans are opt-in) and the imprimatur of a government program, complained that, "Significantly, competitive suppliers are not required to obtain Department approval to
offer new products. They are free to offer new products at will. Under the Guidelines, opt-in
products offered by aggregation programs would be subject to all of the requirements governing
products offered by competitive suppliers. Certainly, aggregations should also be given the same
opportunities."
In making the point that muni aggregations are better able to inform customers of rate options (and thus less DPU oversight is needed), the communities said, "...municipalities have the benefit of leveraging channels
to their residents and businesses not available to direct-to-consumer competitive suppliers, such
as municipal press releases, websites and social media; local government meetings; local cable
access TV; as well as the program website."
"As long as these communications vehicles are in place, consumers can make informed
decisions about whether to participate in the aggregation program. It is not necessary or
appropriate, in the pursuit of consumer protection, for the Department to restrict the products that
the program makes available by requiring those products to be rigidly fixed in the aggregation
plan. Consumers will be able to make their own, informed decisions," the communities said
D.P.U. 23-67
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-23 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
October 9, 2023
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-23 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Natural Gas Senior Scheduler -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Pricing Analyst - Retail Power
• NEW! -- Electricity Pricing Analyst
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Call Center Manager -- Retail Supplier
• Senior Billing Subject Matter - (Remote) -- Retail Supplier
|
|
|