|
|
|
|
PSC Orders Retail Supplier To Return All Customers To Default Service
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by VertexOne, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
After a hearing addressing a response to a show cause order, the Maryland PSC directed SunSea Energy, LLC (Sunsea) to return all of its Maryland customers, both electricity and gas, to default service by 5 p.m. April 10, 2023
The PSC immediately suspended Sunsea's electric and gas supplier licenses, based on what PSC Chairman Jason M. Stanek called, "serious violations".
Sunsea was also ordered to cease all marketing activities and halt enrollments in Maryland
The PSC ordered Sunsea to post an additional $500,000 in security with the Commission (bringing the total posted security to $1 million)
The PSC said that a further hearing process would determine any potential refunds to customers, any potential monetary civil penalty, and any potential license revocation
The PSC's hearing addressed alleged violations of Maryland law and regulations, as alleged by the PSC's Consumer Affairs Division ("CAD")
See background on the allegations here
The PSC from the bench said that it finds as follows with respect to Sunsea:
• Defects in contracting practices
• Unauthorized enrollments
• Misconduct by agents of Sunsea
• Inaccessibility of Sunsea customer service reps
• Other unfair and deceptive marketing and trade practices do exist
Stanek stated, "I cannot begin to emphasize the level of violations that the parties and the Commissioners have found on their own throughout the course of the past few days [of the hearing.]"
Citing testimony from Sunsea's president Jacob Adigwe who appeared before the PSC, Stanek alleged Adigwe, "takes no personal responsibility for the experiences of his customers."
Stanek said that Sunsea presented "little evidence" to dispute allegations in CAD complaint. Rather, Sunsea argued that safeguards put in place since January 2023, which were implemented prior to a CAD memo seeking a show cause order, support Sunsea's continued licensure and service to customers
While Stanek did note that the PSC hasn't received any complaints concerning Sunsea since the enhanced processes were adopted, Stanek cited Sunsea's prior complaint history and prior attempts at compliance, despite previously being subject to a PSC order which prohibited telemarketing by Sunsea and which fined the company $400,000 in 2021
Stanek said that, in the relevant period subject to the current PSC proceedings -- a period of time which is after the 2021 order -- Sunsea recorded 41 complaints in less than 7 months, which Stanek called a "shocking" number
Stanek said that in Q2 and Q3 of last year, Sunsea was either the supplier in Maryland with the most complaints, or the supplier with the second-highest number of complaints
Stanek said, "I have no confidence," based on Sunsea's testimony that Sunsea's training practices have improved substantially since 2021
Further addressing Sunsea's testimony, Stanek said that such testimony, "gives this Commission no assurance that Mr. Adigwe has the fitness to operate a retail energy supply company," Stanek said
Stanek also said "facial violations" continued to exist in a revised contract Sunsea used after the 2021 order
"Customers need to be protected," Stanek said
Sunsea had said in response to the show cause order that, "After SunSea promptly paid the $400,000 fine, the moratorium on its door-to-door marketing activities was lifted. SunSea did not start marketing in Maryland again
until May 11, 2022, when SunSea recommenced door-to-door marketing only. When it
did so, SunSea used substantially the same contracting documents and procedures that
were subject to the 2021 Audit, which was reviewed by the Commission, Staff, and
OPC, with no red flags."
SunSea said that, in response to complaints, it suspended marketing activities, issued refunds,
rerated customers, and terminated agents.
"Rather than attempt to dispute or challenge these complaints with CAD (even
though many are lacking solid evidence, as discussed below), SunSea instead pursued a
100% customer satisfaction target by adopting a policy of issuing refunds, rerating the
customers to the SOS rate, and cancelling the contracts with no termination fees. This is
the same cooperative posture SunSea took earlier in this proceeding, when it issued
refunds and rerated its telemarketing customers, with no termination fees," SunSea has said
"As these new complaints came in, SunSea recognized a problem. Voluntarily,
and in accordance with Staff’s request, SunSea suspended its marketing activities in
October 2022, respecting this Commission’s strict policy about keeping complaints to a
minimum. Before suspending marketing, SunSea fired contractors who were
responsible for more than two complaints, and provided retraining and warnings for
contractors on their first or second complaint.
See Exhibit B [to the response]. This proved insufficient,
however, so SunSea suspended marketing so it could take the time to develop a more
robust solution to the problem that has always plagued it as a small business in the
retail energy industry: the challenge of controlling third-party marketing vendors," SunSea said
"Over the next couple of months, SunSea invested a substantial sum in engaging
an external consultant to develop a state of the art door-to-door enrollment program
specifically designed to make it extremely difficult for third-party vendors to violate
applicable regulatory requirements (the 'Enhanced Safeguards')," SunSea said
"The Enhanced Safeguards constitute a cutting-edge scalable enrollment process
for door-to-door marketing for retail energy customers in Maryland. Among other
things, the Enhanced Safeguards include:
1. Wet-signature contracts for all customers;
2. A parallel digital enrollment and electronic contract; 3. Electronic third-party verification via a proprietary SunSea enrollment
platform;
4. A recorded welcome call; and
5. Numerous automatic fraud checks designed to prevent any fraudulent
enrollments, including geolocation of the enrollment device," SunSea said
"Simply put, the Enhanced Safeguards, taken as a whole, virtually eliminate the
opportunity for third-party vendors to commit slamming infractions in violation of the
Code of Maryland Regulations ('COMAR') 20.53.07.05A, 20.59.07.05A, 20.53.07.08C
and 20.59.07.08C, as alleged in the CAD Memo. Having parallel digital enrollment with
dual wet-signature and electronic contracts, combined with electronic third-party
verification, a recorded telephone call to the customer and geolocation of the enrollment
device make it virtually impossible for an agent to get away with signing up a customer
without his/her consent," SunSea said
Case 9647
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-23 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
April 6, 2023
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Sales Support Specialist
-- Retail Supplier
• Channel Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• Business Development Manager
• Operations Manager/Director -- Retail Supplier -- Texas
|
|
|