|
|
|
|
Texas Senate Business & Commerce Chair, Vice Chair & 7 Senators Tell PUC Not To Implement PCM, Or Other Holistic Market Re-designs, Without Further Legislative Consultation
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Nine Texas state Senators, including Charles Schwertner and Robert Nichols, Chair and Vice Chair (respectively) of the Senate Committee on Business & Commerce, sent a letter to the PUC Chair and Commissioners informing the PUC that any holistic market design change, including the Performance Credit
Mechanism, that goes beyond SB 3 should not be adopted by the Commission without further consultation with the Legislature
The Senators requested that the Commission first take action to define the reliability
goals for the ERCOT region prior to moving forward with any significant market redesign. "In
addition, the Commission should, as directed by law, evaluate the impact of creating a new
market-based ancillary or reliability service to meet this reliability standard," the letter stated
Schwertner said separately that, "Texas desperately needs to build new dispatchable energy resources that we can call upon when the grid is stressed due to extreme weather conditions or periods of higher than normal energy use. Unfortunately, the current market design proposal from the PUC falls short of this fundamental goal."
The Senators' letter stated, "The Commission's recently released Assessment of Market Reform Options to Enhance
Reliability of the ERCOT System report offers different mechanisms to remake the competitive
market, but it does not include any evaluation of the dispatchable ancillary or reliability service
product directed by SB 3. As was discussed during the November 17th Senate Business and
Commerce Committee hearing, there is significant concern the proposals being considered by the
Commission, including the Forward Reliability Market (FRM) and Performance Credit
Mechanism (PCM) options, not only fail to meet the directives clearly stated in SB 3, but more
importantly, will not guarantee new dispatchable generation in a timely and cost-effective
manner."
"We also heard testimony that implementing an administratively complex and novel concept
could in fact deter new investments in the ERCOT market until it is fully in place, which by the
Commission's own admission could be several years down the road. It is not in the best interest
of our constituents to support any proposal that further delays investments in new dispatchable
generation, and the Commission should carefully consider the unintended consequences of any
type of proposal that creates more uncertainty for market participants," the letter stated
"To address these concerns, we request the Commission first take action to define the reliability
goals for the ERCOT region prior to moving forward with any significant market redesign. In
addition, the Commission should, as directed by law, evaluate the impact of creating a new
market-based ancillary or reliability service to meet this reliability standard. Any market
proposal considered by the Commission should also include clear performance requirements,
including strong penalties for nonperformance. Further, any other holistic market design change, including the PCM, that goes beyond the scope of SB 3 should not be adopted by the Commission without further consultation with the Legislature," the letter stated
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-22 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
December 2, 2022
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Pricing Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Pricing and Operations Analyst
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Director
• NEW! -- Market Operations Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Accounting Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Development Representative
• NEW! -- Operations Analyst/Manager - Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Customer Success
• NEW! -- Operations Manager - Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Marketing Associate - Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Supervisor-Commercial Operations
• NEW! -- Market Operations Analyst
• NEW! -- Customer Data Specialist
• NEW! -- Director, Regulatory Affairs, Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Account Manager Project Manager
• NEW! -- Retail Energy Policy Analyst
• NEW! -- Incentive Specialists
• NEW! -- Utility Rates Specialist
• NEW! -- Customer Onboarding Specialist
• NEW! -- Energy Performance Engineer
|
|
|