|
|
|
|
PUC Staff Opposes Rider Meant To "Unbundle" Generation Service Costs From Distribution Rates
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
In a report on Duke Energy Ohio's electric rate case, Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio have recommended that the Commission not adopt a rider meant to unbundle certain costs related to generation service from delivery rates, with such costs instead recovered through a new rider with a rate specific to default service customers as well as a separate rate for shopping customers (for unbundled costs related to operating the choice program)
Duke Energy Ohio had included such rider, known as Rider RR or retail reconciliation rider, in its rate filing, but did not recommend adoption of the rider
The rider would unbundle certain costs related to default service, as well as costs related to running the choice program, and would assign such costs to SSO customers or shopping customers, respectively
Specifically, the default service costs that would be removed from base rates would be labor costs related to PJM settlements for SSO customers, and costs related to calculating SSO rates and related filings
Costs related to Duke's choice program to be removed from base rates and included in the rider would be labor costs related to running Duke's supplier business center, and labor costs related to PJM settlements for retail suppliers
Notably, Duke proposed to not unbundle several costs currently included in distribution rates in the retail reconciliation rider
Duke would not include in the rider PUCO and OCC Assessment Fees, "because these apply to the distribution company, and are not related to generation service."
"Call Center costs are excluded because the call center exists to serve the
needs of the retail distribution customers (including those few customers that take
service at transmission voltage). The call center does not exist to promote SSO
generation service. Most of the calls received by the call center pertain to billing,
disconnections, reconnections, moves, late payments, and general rate questions.
The Company does not maintain logs that record the volume of calls that
specifically deal with SSO generation," Duke said
"Other O&M expenses included in the [distribution rate] filing
are also excluded from this [Rider RR] analysis because those costs exist to serve all
distribution customers," Duke said
Staff agreed that the retail reconciliation rider should not be adopted
"Although the Company proposes a new rider to reallocate costs between Standard Service Offer generation service customers and Competitive Retail Electric Service (CRES) Provider service customers, it did not recommend implementing such a rider. Staff agrees with the Company that the Rider should not be approved and implemented," Staff said
In its testimony, Duke had said that Rider RR should not be adopted because cost recovery would vary with the amount of customer switching.
"The dependence of base distribution revenue recovery on generation
switching is unfair to customers and the Company. If switching percentages
change, customers could over-pay or under-pay for base distribution costs. At the
same time, the Company could over-recover or under-recover its base distribution
revenues. These under- or over-recoveries cannot be trued-up between rate cases
because base rates are not trued-up, and because generation switching percentages
change over time," Duke said
"Rider RR would require frequent true-ups to ensure that customers
do not over- or under-pay, and that the Company does not over- or under-collect
the base distribution revenues. These true-ups and associated audits would likely
add to the Company’s and the Commission’s administrative burden,' Duke said
"All distribution base rates, including large
commercial and industrial rates, would need to be decoupled from actual sales for
true-ups to be possible," Duke said
Case No. 21-888-EL-ATA et al.
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-21 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
May 23, 2022
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! --
Field Analyst I, Sales Quality
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Regulatory Compliance and Strategy Manager
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Channel Marketing Strategy Lead
-- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Business Analyst I -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Accounting Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Web Applications Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Business Development Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Chief Sales and Marketing Officer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! --
Regional Manager: Power Marketing
• NEW! -- Gas Scheduler I - Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Senior Energy Portfolio Analyst
• NEW! -- Operations Billing Analyst
- Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Head of Operations -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Head of Digital -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Senior Energy Pricing Lead - Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager - ERCOT -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Development Rep
• NEW! -- Structuring Senior Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- National Key Accounts Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Director -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Power Supply Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Technical Sales Advisor -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Support Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Software Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Gas Scheduler II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- C# Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- IT/OT Asset Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager III -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Energy Markets Pricing Analyst
• Energy Pricing Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• Digital Marketing Manager -- Energy Marketer
|
|
|