|
|
|
|
Alliance for Retail Markets Says Two Proposed Load-Side Reliability Solutions In ERCOT Warrant Further Consideration
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
In comments filed with the Texas PUC, the Alliance for Retail Markets said that two proposed load-side reliability solutions for the ERCOT market warrant further consideration
"While ARM is not advocating for any specific Phase II proposal at this time, ARM believes that a long-term load-side reliability solution could help ensure reliability and stability of the ERCOT market. To that end, two proposals filed in this project, the Load Serving Entity Reliability Obligation ('LSERO') proposal and STEC's Reliability Service proposal, warrant further consideration by the Commission. ARM strongly supports the Commission continuing its evaluation, development, and refinement of theses Phase II concepts, and each of our members have different issues they will be seeking to work through depending on the Phase II mechanism the Commission ultimately adopts," ARM said
ARM maintains that the following elements are important to consider to help ensure the continued health of the retail electric market:
• "Load-side reliability solutions could provide transparent and manageable costs for REPs. Such solutions should be designed to enable REPs to proactively cover supply sources for their anticipated load, which is similar in principle to the need for REPs to hedge their energy needs in today's market structure. This is a healthy activity that should be encouraged by the ERCOT wholesale market design.
• "The continued success of the retail electric market depends on the ability of REPs to know and manage costs. When costs are understood and risks are manageable, competition will drive the greatest value for customers.
• "Patchwork fixes (e.g., increased ancillary service procurement and Reliability Unit Commitment ('RUC') utilization) may shore up reliability in the shorter term but may create negative long-term reliability consequences and lead to higher prices for customers."
• "The sooner the Commission concludes its evaluation of Phase II market design proposals, the sooner REPs can plan for the future to help ensure the prices REPs offer customers are realistic and as stable as possible."
Project 52373
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-21 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
March 29, 2022
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Operations Billing Analyst
- Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Head of Operations -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Head of Digital -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Senior Energy Pricing Lead - Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager - ERCOT -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Development Rep
• NEW! -- Structuring Senior Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- National Key Accounts Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Director -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Power Supply Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Technical Sales Advisor -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Support Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Software Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Gas Scheduler II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- C# Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- IT/OT Asset Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager III -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Energy Markets Pricing Analyst
• Energy Pricing Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• Digital Marketing Manager -- Energy Marketer
|
|
|