|
|
|
|
ConEd Seeks Emergency Changes To Default Service Electricity Supply Pricing Mechanism
The following story is brought free of charge to readers by EC Infosystems, the exclusive EDI provider of EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. has filed at the New York PSC for emergency approval of electricity tariff amendments that, "provide for an electric supply cost recovery mechanism that
will more closely align supply prices with the Company’s hedging positions, reducing the
likelihood of significant customer bill volatility."
ConEd noted that the energy component of the Company’s Market Supply Charge ("MSC") is currently
developed for each rate class based on NYISO day-ahead hourly energy prices and hourly weights
developed from class-specific load shapes. Separate energy prices are developed for the New York
City load zone (Zone J) and for each of the two Westchester load zones (Zones H and I). These
energy prices are determined for each customer’s bill based on the actual market prices for that
customer’s billing period.
The Adjustment Factor - MSC II is primarily used to recover hedging costs from customers
or refund hedging benefits to customers. It includes an estimate of hedging costs or benefits for
the billing month and a reconciliation of the preceding month’s estimated versus actual hedging
costs or benefits.
Under the current mechanism, increases or decreases in the market price of energy directly
affect customers’ bills as they occur, while the difference between forecasted and actual hedging
impact is provided in a subsequent month’s Adjustment Factor - MSC II.
"To better align the manner in which market prices and associated hedging impacts are
applied to customers’ bills, the Company is proposing to calculate the energy component of the
MSC using forecasts of energy prices each month, along with estimates of associated hedging
impacts," ConEd said
As proposed, the Company will develop the MSC’s energy component for each rate class using
forecasted energy prices (including estimates of associated hedging impacts) and hourly weights
developed from class-specific load shapes. The energy prices will be determined for each
customer’s bill based on the forecasted prices for that customer’s billing period. Differences
between actual energy costs and energy revenues derived from the MSC (including hedging
impacts) will continue to be recovered through the MSC adjustments, ConEd said
To implement these changes, the Company is proposing the following changes to the
Electric Tariff:
• The definition for costs/benefits of "hedges" has been renamed "Hedging Impact" and
moved under the definitions section in General Rule 25.
• The description of the cost of energy in General Rules 25.1(a)(1) and 25.1(b) has been
changed to reflect that the cost of energy used in the determination of the MSC will be
based on a forecast of NYISO market prices and an estimate of the associated Hedging
Impact.
• The Adjustment Factor - MSC II has been revised to reflect that it will no longer
recover the entire the Hedging Impact, because the estimated Hedging Impact is
recovered through the MSC itself. The Adjustment Factor – MSC II will recover the
reconciliation of the Hedging Impact that was recovered in the MSC and the actual
incurred Hedging Impact from the previous month.
• General Rule 25.2.3, which describes the reconciliations of the Adjustment Factor -
MSC I and Adjustment Factor - MSC II has been revised to clarify that such
reconciliations may be passed through the Adjustment Factor - MSC I and Adjustment
Factor - MSC II over multiple months.
ConEd proposes that these tariff changes become effective on June 1, 2022
Separately, the New York PSC noted in a press release today that, "The other major utilities, Orange and Rockland, National Grid, NYSEG, RG&E, National Fuel, PSEG Long Island, and Central Hudson, are reviewing their existing power supply purchasing to mitigate the risk of severe price volatility, refocusing their efforts to educate consumers regarding anticipated bill increases, and increasing outreach and education efforts to promote consumer payment assistance plans and programs to reduce energy usage."
As previously reported, the PSC had directed such utilities to review their approaches to full-service supply billing to ensure they are reducing the likelihood of extreme and sudden price volatility
ADVERTISEMENT Copyright 2010-21 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please
email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
March 16, 2022
Email This Story
Copyright 2010-21 EnergyChoiceMatters.com
Reporting by Paul Ring • ring@energychoicematters.com
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com:
• NEW! -- Senior Energy Pricing Lead - Retail Energy
• NEW! -- Sales Development Rep
• NEW! -- Structuring Senior Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Head of Operations -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Head of Digital -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- National Key Accounts Sales Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager - ERCOT -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Director -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Power Supply Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Technical Sales Advisor -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Sales Support Analyst II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Software Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Gas Scheduler II -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- C# Developer -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- IT/OT Asset Manager -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Business Development Manager III -- Retail Supplier
• NEW! -- Energy Markets Pricing Analyst
• Energy Pricing Analyst -- Retail Supplier
• Digital Marketing Manager -- Energy Marketer
|
|
|