Pa. ALJ Recommends Adopting PPL SREC Settlement, Not Requiring Aggregators to Sign
Long-Term Contracts
Email This Story
December 28, 2010
A recommended decision from a Pennsylvania ALJ would approve a settlement regarding
the procurement of solar alternative energy credits (SRECs) at PPL Electric Utilities,
and would decline to require solar aggregators under a small system carve-out to
certify that they have long term contracts for SRECs (P-2008-2060309).
As only noted in Matters, the settlement provides for the procurement of SRECs, for
residential default service only, under long-term contracts of seven to nine years
in length, under competitive RFPs (see details in 11/24). The procurements would
be for 3,000 SRECs per year, resulting in target quantities of 27,000 SRECs for Solicitation
1 (a delivery period of 9 years), 24,000 SRECs for Solicitation 2 (a delivery period
of 8 years), and 21,000 SRECs for Solicitation 3 (a delivery period of 7 years).
Additionally, a set-aside program for SRECs from solar systems with a DC rating of
15 kW or less would be created. Such SRECs would be procured under bilateral contracts
with solar aggregators, and not system owners. The set aside amount shall be equal
to 1,000 SRECs for the 9-year term, 1,100 SRECs for the 8-year term, and 1,600 SRECs
for the 7-year term.
The ALJ recommended adopting the settlement terms without modification.
The single issue reserved for litigation concerned whether solar aggregators under
the small system set aside program should be required to certify that they have signed
long term contracts for SRECs.
The Sustainable Energy Fund of Central Eastern Pennsylvania (SEF) argued that such
a certification requirement is necessary to ensure that long-term contracts are available
to solar generation owners, which SEF said are needed to support solar development.
SEF said that solar aggregators may not sign long-term contracts with generation
developers, absent a mandate, due to the surplus of SRECs in the state.
However, the ALJ agreed with PPL that the SEF's proposed mandate would (1) limit
the options of small-scale solar owners (some of whom may eschew long-term contracts
in expectation of higher future SREC prices); (2) discourage participation from those
aggregators forced to comply; (3) bar the participation of new solar operators; and
(4) require PPL to incur additional administrative costs (to be passed onto ratepayers)
by forcing it to confirm that the aggregators' contracts were long-term.
"There is no evidence to support a finding that requiring long-term contracts for
small scale developers would be desirable to the developers and aggregators save
[SEF's] opinion that the only way to promote revenue stability is to provide long-term
contracts and ensure a funding stream," the ALJ found.
"SEF has not produced any evidence that solar aggregators can meet the long-term
contract requirement, nor has it produced any evidence that aggregators or small
system owners want long-term contracts," the ALJ said in rejecting the proposed certification
requirement.
Email This Story
HOME
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email
or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication
prohibited.
