Consulting |
Search |
AEP Ohio Says State Rate Cannot Usurp FERC Role in Setting Capacity Costs
Email This
Story
December 20, 2010
Interpreting the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement as eliminating a Fixed Resource
Requirement (FRR) entity's ability to seek relief from FERC regarding the cost paid
for capacity under an FRR plan where a state-
Columbus Southern Power and Ohio Power have applied to institute a cost-
However, AEP Ohio claimed that any such pre-
"Nowhere in any Commission orders approving the FRR compensation mechanism is there any suggestion that state commissions could usurp this Commission's exclusive jurisdiction to set wholesale sales rates for FRR Entities or that FRR Entities agree to waive their Section 205 rights if state commission's attempt to do so," the AEP companies said.
The AEP Ohio companies cited FERC's recent decision regarding rates paid by utilities for combined heat and power mandated by California as reiterating that FERC's, "authority under the FPA includes the exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the rates, terms and conditions of sales for resale of electric energy in interstate commerce," and that efforts by a state commission to set the rate for the wholesale sale of electric energy are preempted by the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction.
The AEP Ohio companies also argued that POLR rates in Ohio do no compensate the FRR entities for capacity costs.
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.
Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing
Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters
Call Paul Ring
954-
Consulting |
Search |