About

Archive

Contact

Consulting

Abbreviations

Search

ABACCUS Residential Rankings Shift As Load Size Added to Criteria

Email This Story
December 6, 2010

Texas retained its top spot in the Annual Baseline Assessment of Choice in Canada and the United States (ABACCUS) for residential markets reported by Distributed Energy Financial Group, but the addition of several new criteria jumbled the rankings after the top three.

Most notably, Connecticut, which has a higher statewide percentage of migrated residential customers than any other North American market except for Texas, fell five spots in the latest residential rankings.  Connecticut placed 12th, falling from 7th a year ago, though its numeric score was relatively constant (45 in 2010 versus 47 in 2009).

However, several jurisdictions jumped ahead of Connecticut in the rankings with higher scores, notably Ohio (with no residential offers in several service areas), Illinois (with a single publicized residential offer), New Jersey, and Ontario.  Aside from lacking the significant residential migration present in Connecticut, those markets also lack state-wide Purchase of Receivables, a customer referral program, and generally do not have a significantly more market-based default service procurement process than Connecticut.

The primary reason for the changes in rankings was several additional criteria added in the ABACCUS methodology for 2010.  Most prominently, market size was added for the first time as a measure of market attractiveness.  This new market size metric is largely responsible for large states with less attractive retail market designs (Illinois, Ohio) jumping ahead of Connecticut, which has done everything asked of it by retail suppliers except move to quarterly priced default service.

2010 ABACCUS Residential Rankings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABACCUS noted that Connecticut is significantly ahead of nearly all markets in terms of statewide residential migration, with Connecticut leading the U.S. among states with a traditional default service provider (totals include municipal aggregation):

Texas                        87.1%
Connecticut               32.1%
Alberta                      27.2%
Ohio                         24.4%
New York                  17.9%
Massachusetts          12.2%
Pennsylvania             10.0%
Maryland                    9.6%

ABACCUS also released rankings of commercial and industrial markets, with Texas leading, followed by New York and Illinois.  Complete commercial and industrial rankings can be found on DEFG's website in the ABACCUS report (p. 14).

The ABACCUS rankings are based on a formula of several metrics covering: 1) retail market status, 2) wholesale market competition, 3) default or standard service design, and 4) facilitation of the choice of retailer.


Email This Story

HOME

Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters.  If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.

 

Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing

Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters

Call Paul Ring

954-205-1738

 

 

 

 

 

Energy Choice
                            

Matters

About

Archive

Contact

Consulting

Abbreviations

Search

2010 Rank

State

2010 Score

2010 Assessment

2009 Rank

1

Texas

86

Excellent

1

2

New York

63

Excellent

2

3

Alberta

62

Good

3

4

Pennsylvania

58

Good

9

5

Maryland

54

Marginal

4

6

Massachusetts

49

Good

5

7

Ohio

48

Marginal

16

8

Illinois

47

Good

8

9

Maine

46

Marginal

6

10

Ontario

46

Marginal

14

11

New Jersey

45

Marginal

10

12

Connecticut

45

Good

7

13

District of Columbia

41

Marginal

11

14

New Hampshire

36

Marginal

12

15

Rhode Island

32

Marginal

15

16

Delaware

32

Marginal

12

17

Michigan

NA

Unsatisfactory

18

18

California

NA

Unsatisfactory

17

19

Montana

NA

Unsatisfactory

19

20

Virginia

NA

Unsatisfactory

20

21

Oregon

NA

Unsatisfactory

21

22

Nevada

NA

Unsatisfactory

22

23

Arizona

NA

Unsatisfactory

23