Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |
ICC Staff, Utilities, Suppliers Call ALJ Treatment of RECs in Procurement Plan Inconsistent
with Statute
Email This Story
December 2, 2010
A proposed order from an Illinois ALJ which would find that the Illinois Power Agency
is compelled to purchase physical renewable energy under the Illinois Power Agency
Act contravenes definitions in the statute itself as well as Illinois Commerce Commission
precedent, ICC Staff, Commonwealth Edison, Ameren, and retail suppliers said in separately
filed briefs on exceptions (Docket 10-
As only noted in Matters, the ALJ's proposed order concluded that the Illinois Power
Agency Act requires the procurement of physical renewable energy supply, and not
just RECs. As such, the ALJ recommended adoption of a proposal from Iberdrola Renewables
for long-
However, several intervenors noted that the Act expressly includes RECs within the definition of "renewable energy resources" to be procured by the Illinois Power Agency under the required procurement plan. Staff, the utilities, and retail suppliers faulted the ALJ's strained interpretation which ignores this explicit definition.
"In effect, the ALJPO creates its own definition for the term renewable energy resource, despite the fact that the term is defined already under the IPA Act," Staff noted. Specifically, the definition of renewable energy resource contained in the act defines the term as including, "energy and its associated renewable energy credit or renewable energy credits from wind, solar ... [and going to list several other fuels]."
The proposed order's conclusion on physical renewable energy, "is in complete contradiction of the IPA Act," Staff said.
The Illinois Competitive Energy Association further noted that another subsection
upon which the ALJ relies for ordering long-
Aside from the incorrect statutory interpretation, ComEd took exception to the proposed
long-
"The Public Utilities Act only authorizes the Commission to approve a proposed plan if: 'the Commission determines that [the plan] will ensure adequate, reliable, affordable, efficient, and environmentally sustainable electric service at the lowest total cost over time, taking into account price stability," ComEd noted.
Despite this clear requirement for lowest total cost over time, ComEd said that the proposed order, "appears to adopt the view that more expensive methods of meeting renewable energy resource requirements can be adopted as long as their cost does not exceed the [cost] cap."
However, ComEd argued that the Commission can only approve plans with the lowest
total cost over time, not plans that have "reasonable" costs, or even of plans that
have "low" costs. Additionally, ComEd noted that, "there is a significant premium
associated with the procurement of longer term renewables, potentially reaching as
high as $50 per megawatt-
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.
Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing
Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters
Call Paul Ring
954-
Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |