Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |
AEP Ohio Utilities Seek to Raise Capacity Costs Paid by Ohio Retail Suppliers
Email
This Story
November 22, 2010
Columbus Southern Power and Ohio Power have petitioned FERC to alter how competitive retail electric service (CRES) providers in Ohio compensate the AEP Ohio utilities for capacity under the utilities' use of the Fixed Resource Requirement of the Reliability Pricing Model.
Specifically, the AEP Ohio utilities have sought approval from FERC to transition
from a market-
"AEP Ohio Companies have not been fully recovering from Ohio CRES Providers a fully-
Under the proposed changes, competitive providers would collectively pay an additional 50%, or $6.2 million, in capacity costs to Columbus Southern Power and an additional 92%, or $26,000, to Ohio Power.
Under the pro forma rates, the capacity cost would increase from $208.20/MW-
In cases where a utility uses the Fixed Resource Requirement to meet its PJM capacity obligations, alternative suppliers serving migrated load must compensate the Fixed Resource Requirement entity for capacity associated with the migrated customer. If the retail choice state sets a policy to determine such compensation, the state policy shall hold. However, if the state does not set forth such compensation, the Fixed Resource Requirement entity shall be compensated at the capacity price in the unconstrained portions of the PJM Region, unless the Fixed Resource Requirement entity elects to make a filing with FERC to change the compensation to a method based on the Fixed Resource Requirement entity's cost or such other basis shown to be just and reasonable.
The AEP Ohio utilities have filed to change the basis for their capacity compensation
to a cost-
AEP Ohio said that the Capacity Compensation Formulas are designed to recover from
Ohio competitive retailers, "the appropriate share of the AEP Ohio Companies' respective
total generation revenue requirement through annually-
"The formulas are fairly standard cost-
"One significant difference, however, is that AEP is not proposing the typical two-
"This methodology is particularly appropriate for the FRR capacity market, as it
provides the Ohio [competitive] Providers with certainty as to the daily capacity
charges; i.e., they will not be subject to potential surcharges after the true-
The Capacity Compensation Formulas are intended to permit the AEP Ohio Companies
to recover 100% of construction work in progress ("CWIP") expenditures for Pollution
Control Facilities and Fuel Conversion Facilities and 50% of all other CWIP expenditures.
The costs will also include Post-
AEP Ohio proposed an initial rate of return on common equity ("ROE") of 11.1%.
The FERC dockets are ER11-
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.
Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing
Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters
Call Paul Ring
954-
Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |