Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |
N.Y. Utilities Seek Additional Marketing Regulations for ESCOs
Email This Story
November
16, 2010
The joint New York utilities have recommended changes to the Uniform Business Practices
(UBPs) beyond the currently pending changes addressing door-
"To address one marketing tactic at the exclusion of others that exist today or will exist in the future creates a loophole through which vulnerable customers could be deceived," said the joint utilities, which include Central Hudson Gas & Electric, Consolidated Edison, Orange and Rockland, National Fuel Gas Distribution, National Grid, New York State Electric & Gas, and Rochester Gas & Electric.
To begin, the utilities proposed that a definition for marketing be added to the UBPs, which would define marketing as, "[t]he publication, dissemination or distribution of informational and advertising materials regarding the ESCO's services and products to the public by print, broadcast, electronic media, direct mail or by telecommunication."
The joint utilities, "intend that electronic media be interpreted broadly to include
the Internet, e-
Utilities proposed the addition of a new §10.C.1.c to the UBPs holding that:
"An ESCO
representative shall not dress in uniforms, wear any apparel or display any badges
or other items that contain any branding elements that are similar to that of the
distribution utility (including logo) nor shall any ESCO representative possess any
item containing the distribution utility's logo including, but not limited to, clip
boards, utility bills and/or statements, or other items that could be interpreted
by the customer to imply a relationship between the ESCO and distribution utility
that does not exist. In this context, an ESCO representative is defined to be any
person acting on behalf of an ESCO, whether employee, contractor, or independent
agent."
Further, utilities said that a new subsection should be added relating to ESCO marketing to customers via traditional mail.
"In recent months, utilities have observed mailings to potential customers with envelopes addressed in a fashion to imply that they were sent by the utility," the joint utilities said.
Joint Utilities proposed a new §10.C.3, Contact with Customers via Mail:
3. Contact
with Customers via Traditional Mail
a. No part of an ESCO mailing should be labeled, colored, or marked in any manner that would make the envelope appear to be from the distribution utility, that would imply a relationship between the ESCO and distribution utility that does not exist, or that would otherwise appear ambiguous as to the source of the mailing;
b. No part of an ESCO mailing should reference the name of the distribution utility (or derivative thereof) that in any way would imply a relationship between the ESCO and distribution utility that does not exist;
c. The ESCO's name and address should be clearly visible on the front of the envelope in [the] area customarily designated for a return address;
The joint utilities also proposed new §10.C.4, Contact with Customers via Internet
or Other Electronic Means:
4. Contact with Customers via Internet or Other Electronic
Means
With regard to ESCO web sites, email messages, text messages, radio, television
and any other electronic communication media:
a. Such communications should not utilize Uniform Resource Locators (URL), links, analogous addressing, phone numbers or subject designations that would make the ESCO's marketing message appear to be from the distribution utility;
b. ESCO web sites used for marketing should contain a clear and conspicuous link to the ESCO Consumer Bill of Rights;
c. Other than to identify utility territories in which an ESCO is authorized to provide service, ESCO web sites used for marketing purposes should not be structured in any manner nor reference the name of the distribution utility (or derivative thereof) that would imply a relationship between the ESCO and distribution utility that does not exist;
The utilities further proposed language requiring ESCOs to, "[d]escribe distribution utility services in a factual and neutral manner."
The joint utilities said that existing 10.C.2.c should be interpreted broadly so
as to prohibit telephone numbers and/or auto-
The joint utilities opposed suggestions that the ESCO Consumer Bill of Rights should
only be provided to customers agreeing to take ESCO service. "With the proposed
limitation, residential customers and customers approached through door-
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.
Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing
Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters
Call Paul Ring
954-
Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |