Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |
Advertise with Energy Choice Matters
This space is taken, but prime spots still available on each sidebar. Call Paul
Ring 954-
Illinois Collaborative Releases Smart Grid Report; Court Strikes ComEd Recovery of
Certain Smart Grid Charges
Email This Story
October 4, 2010
The Illinois Statewide Smart
Grid Collaborative has filed a report with the Illinois Commerce Commission providing
a detailed analysis of the issues surrounding the development of a smart grid in
Illinois.
Separately, an Illinois appeals court overturned an ICC decision which had allowed Commonwealth Edison to recover certain costs associated with distribution enhancements and the smart grid. ComEd said that the ruling jeopardizes future smart grid investment.
Of note to the retail market, the Collaborative report addresses customer and third-
Additionally, the report notes that the smart grid implicates potential changes to
the default service rate structure (e.g. time of use or real-
The Collaborative's recommendations with respect to in-
1. AMI systems deployed by utilities in Illinois should allow consumers to easily
connect in-
2. To the extent that PMDs are found by the Commission to be necessary to capture
AMI customer benefits, and that a demonstrable business case is made for utility
involvement in their provision to consumers, policies to facilitate access to PMDs
may be warranted. In assessing how utilities could aid customers in obtaining PMDs
without impeding PMD market development, the Commission should compare the projected
effects of direct utility provision of PMDs with the projected effects of using non-
3. Any provision of PMD by a utility is subject to IDC [Integrated Distribution Company] rules and should not require the customer to purchase utility supply in order to receive and make use of the PMD. To the extent practicable, PMD should be capable of presenting billing and pricing information from either a utility or an ARES [alternative retail electric supplier].
4. Any PMD subsidies that may be deemed by the Commission to be appropriate in order to achieve smart grid objectives should be competitively neutral with respect to electricity supplier.
5. Smart grid policies should be consistent with but not dependent upon the state's policy to foster the development of retail electric competition. In the evaluation of proposed utility rate offerings and demand response programs, the Commission should be guided by actual experience concerning the interplay between such programs and the development of retail competition. In determining smart grid policy, the Commission should consider the effect of such policies on the development of retail competition and the effect of retail competition on achievement of the goals of smart grid deployment.
6. In order to protect consumers and allow the nascent market in smart grid-
Recommendations regarding customer and third-
1. AMI systems should be designed so that customers can securely retrieve usage data
directly and in near real time from the meter securely through in-
2. Customers should have access to collected historical usage and billing data for
a reasonable period of time, via a utility-
3. Customer authorization should continue to be required for access to any customer-
4. Third parties should fully disclose in plain language the scope, duration, and
purpose(s) of the requested access to customer-
5. The utility should provide electronic access to billing and usage data to customer-
6. A service and supply agreement with a customer should explicitly authorize an Alternate Retail Electric Supplier (ARES) to access and use usage and billing data for billing purposes. Any authorization to access historical data or other information not directly related to billing and collection should be explicitly stated in such an agreement. Authorization to provide usage information to an ISO should be included, if necessary. Cancellation or expiration of the supply agreement should also revoke a supplier's access rights to the customer's data. A utility should not be required to customize or disaggregate data.
7. Utilities and customer-
8. The utility should be allowed to use customer-
9. The utility should be allowed to use customer-
10. Stakeholders agree that the utility should only be allowed to make use of the Meter Data and Customer Data for offering a competitive service or share such information with any affiliated or unaffiliated entity to the extent allowed by, and consistent with all applicable laws, ICC rules and orders. Some stakeholders further believe that if a utility or its affiliate offers competitive services, they should not, under any circumstances, be allowed to use customer Meter Data in offering those services without affirmative customer authorization and application of third party disclosure requirements.
11. Governmental units should not have unauthorized access to customer-
12. Customers should be educated and informed about what it means to allow access
to AMI-
13. If a utility provides a third party with aggregated AMI meter data, it must take reasonable measures to protect the identity of individual customers. Where individual customer data privacy cannot reasonably be assured, the third party should obtain authorization from the customer for access to identifiable customer data prior to its release by the utility.
Copyright 2010 Energy Choice Matters. If you wish to share this story, please email or post the website link; unauthorized copying, retransmission, or republication prohibited.
Be Seen By Energy Professionals in Retail and Wholesale Marketing
Run Ads with Energy Choice Matters
Call Paul Ring 954-
Consulting |
Abbreviations |
Search |